121 views 10 comments

Heroes of the Zeroes: 28 Days Later …

by on January 6, 2010
Editor Rating
Total Yaps


Hover To Rate
User Rating
Total Yaps


You have rated this


The Heroes of the Zeroes is Nick Rogers’ daily, alphabetical look back at the 365 best films from 2000 to 2009.

“28 Days Later … ”
Rated R

Danny Boyle’s 2002 virus flick was a truly terrifying fright machine, pushing forth scream-and-jump fun. It also offered a human resonance that lingered with the scares and a grim, beautiful blurriness courtesy of its digitally shot picture.

Working with screenwriter Alex Garland, Boyle cut a chilling swath through the “it can’t happen here” notion of pandemic infection — in this case, a “rage virus” transferred, bloodily, from monkeys to humans.

That creates fast-running flesh-cravers (purists might debate terming them “zombies”) who sprint and leap after their prey, but the humans aren’t dumb fodder. Boyle astonishingly mixes shock-tactic scares with introspection about human comforts to which we cling, whether it’s crème de menthe or a cheeseburger.

There are furious attack scenes — including a London-street firebombing and a close call in a dark apartment staircase. But a discovery at one character’s home effects the mood with quietude, and because of the infection’s quick nature — and that there are no big stars — we don’t know who will be killed when in as quick a shock to the viewer as it is to the characters.

Reminiscent of “Apocalypse Now” as a hallucinatory, bombed-out hell hosting uncertain travels, “28 Days Later …” similarly played itself out at a military encampment where lunacy prevails. Whatever steam it lost during this ho-hum spook-house run didn’t completely slow the film. In a film better than “Slumdog Millionaire,” Boyle envisioned hope, remembrance, sadness and loss — in other words, everything napalmed right out of the lackluster sequel, “28 Weeks Later.”