The 52 Worst Films of the 2000s

Movies You Aught Not Watch: Fun with Dick and Jane (2005)

Movies You Aught Not Watch is Nick Rogers’ weekly, alphabetical look back at the 52 worst films of 2000-2009.

“Fun with Dick and Jane”
Rated PG-13

Each year, America seems to push at least one film to $100 million or more in a collective cinematic fugue — movies not necessarily bad, but so unremarkable that, as they air at 1 a.m. on USA or Spike, people will be unable to recall seeing them, let alone the plots or conscious decisions to leave the house.

Exhibit A: The $110-million gross of the 2005 remake of “Fun with Dick and Jane,” easily the most embarrassing project to which Judd Apatow has offered his screenwriting pen. This corporate-greed satire doesn’t just lack bite. (Look! Everyone has the same Beamer!) It lacks gnaw. It even lacks nibble.

Consider it a signed confession of remake rape when a “produced by Jim Carrey” credit appears atop his noodle-limbed exaggeration of “I Believe I Can Fly.”

He’s Dick, a newly appointed corporate stooge who loses his shirt after unfairly taking the fall for his company’s bankruptcy. Deploying her usual overbearing-shrew shtick, Tea Leoni is Jane, his wife, and there’s more marital bonding in the credits of “The Jetsons” than in this film.

Dick and Jane turn to robbery — the spoils seemingly going toward gender-bending getups. A heist finale attempts to validate these vainglorious bastards when we’d rather see their kid raised by the maid (the only Latin not denigrated by an illegal-alien detour insultingly played for wackiness).

Thoroughly offensive to the point where even a soundtrack snippet from Johnny Cash, who knew true poverty, rankles, you’ll want to be done with Dick and Jane.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

4 Responses to “Movies You Aught Not Watch: Fun with Dick and Jane (2005)”

  1. […] reboots is that we occasionally receive a kickass gift we’ve coveted for years. A small handful genuinely, and unconditionally, suck. A few implement a modicum of new-spin momentum that neither sullies nor substitutes the original. […]

  2. Dustin says:

    A guy I work with was going on and on about how funny this movie was. I really wasn’t too interested in seeing it in the first place because it just didn’t appeal to me and I was sort of sick of Jim Carrey at the time, but I watched it anyway based on his recommendation. What a waste of time! Not one laugh and so much of the movie seemed forced. I’ve learned not take any of his recommendations in the future…

  3. Margie Pferrer says:

    We wish studios would just quit trying to remake classic movies! When was the last time there was actually a good one?

  4. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Nick Rogers, The Film Yap. The Film Yap said: We followed the rules and we got screwed. #worstfilmsofthedecade #moviesyouaughtnotwatch […]